Tag: landscape

Cove

What can I say except this was one hell of a challenge! I wanted simplicity in the form of abstraction combined with atmospheric perspective. Well, the day is crisp and bright, a bit windy, and the light is harsh. Somewhere in there lays a bit of compromise.

The largest areas of the painting -sky, water – were laid in with very wet washes and allowed to dry.

The clouds were lifted out later and more blue, wet paint applied over the initial light wash. Shadows and shapes were created during this step.

The sea was a light wash with simple areas of white left behind in the foreground. Somehow the rest of it sort of happened using a large, flat brush. I find using flats really helps push the abstraction. The same can be said with the shoreline, using color to indicate plants, rocks, cliffs. The most “planned” part of the coastline were the houses and roofs. Dry brush with darker blues were applied with a wide 1″ brush to give the sea some dimension.

I had no idea how this painting would turn out. I like it for the simple fact I did achieve my desires for a simple, abstract painting which still has recognizable subject matter.

Wouldn’t it be great if we all liked everything we did? Maybe not – then we would probably never progress!

Incoming Storm – Mt. Tamalpais

I do love the views and hills of Mt. Tamalpais year round! The views are amazing, the ocean not too far away, and the sky and weather always different throughout the seasons.

The sky in this painting was sort of an area to play with. Sky in watercolor is done with as soon as you lay it down. For the most part, that is!

Painting a sky is usually thought about and then laid in with a fair amount of water and color, avoiding areas for clouds, letting colors bleed, and all sorts of tricks such as blotting up color with cotton or tissue to make clouds. It’s a lot of fun! Here, I did go back in and lift some paint in the right side of the sky, re-wet it, and then laid in more color. It is okay but did not really work. Still, I did salvage it more to my liking.

Next, the foreground. I like my tree and grasses and rocks. The mid-ground with the trees is also to my liking. The land between the mid-ground and the horizon is too colorful and too bright – it should be a bit lighter and perhaps a bit more neutral.

Overall, I am fairly pleased with the results here. I tried to work as directly with color and water as possible. I used a bit of frisket in the rocks and in the foreground to maintain a bit of white.

As I said above, I try to paint with my colors very directly. This means mixing up large puddles of color and painting from that puddle, adding other colors as I move along with my wash to create variety. It requires a bit of thought as well as knowing what colors work together and so on. I mix these colors on my palette often before applying any to the paper.

Many people lay down glazes and work with layers in their watercolors, but I find that, while pretty, those methods of painting create a rather tame look. A lack of freshness is the only way I can describe it. On the other hand, my approach is quite challenging as I don’t build up colors but try to work with thick, rich colors and pray a lot. As a result, my watercolors tend to by quite gaudy, I think!!

Watercolor, Arches 140# Rough, 11×14.

Above the Lake

Lately I am not interested in pretty pictures so much as I am in simplifying or working on specific techniques in watercolor. Here, the main goals were the foreground rocks – making simple but still suggestive of a bit of an outcropping – and a sense of wind on the water and reflections of the trees. Well, the rocks turned out to my liking, the waves on the water okay, but the reflections are a total flop. More careful planning next time around!

Watercolor, Arches 140# CP, 9×12.

Into the Mists

The Great Smoky Mountains get their name from the mists that rise up from the hollows. The park was established in the 1930s and are part of Appalachia, itself which covers parts of New York south into the Carolinas, Georgia, Alabama, and more. My own family on my father’s side can trace itself back through many areas, in particular Tennessee. As a kid, my family traveled through these mountains a bit, but I have never had the opportunity to spend a lot of time exploring them.

Here, I tried to work with a limited palette as well as a wet-in-wet technique to create the sense of fog and mistiness of the distant trees. The sense of just a wetness to the landscape – lush greens, trees, mists – is another thing I wanted to convey. I think it works.

Watercolor, 9×12, Arches 140# CP paper.

Master Copy: Erin Hanson’s “Coastal Light”

Erin Hanson painted this painting in 2017 and it measures 24×30 inches. You can find it here on her website. It is called “Coastal Light” and it shows an evening (my opinion) in Southern California sometime in the spring when the rains have come and the hills are green.

I chose this to use as a master copy because the composition is simple, and I felt I could relate to it emotionally. For me, connecting with a painting or subject matter is very subjective – if I don’t like something I am not interested. I also felt I could handle the colors comfortably.

My own painting is in oils and as I worked on my copy, obviously things shifted. This master copy measures 16×20 inches, so of course my proportions are a bit different.

A number of things drew me to this painting. First, as I stated above, was the relative simplicity of the composition. The colors Hanson uses are vibrant and the air shimmers a bit. The leaves seem to flutter in a light breeze. I like the quiet energy of “Coastal Light”. The spring evening is very gentle. Additionally, what also attracted me was the way Hanson subtly outlines the shapes of the tree trunks, vegetation, clouds and terrain. Brush strokes give a sense of direction, especially in the foreground.

Initially, I tried to paint this using acrylic paint. I laid down the initial painting about 6 months ago, and really did not like it. Acrylic paints are not easy to use as they dry so quickly. I found the painting rather harsh and was thinking of painting over it with something else. Instead, it sat in the garage, ignored. And, I think, that was not a bad thing.

When my current painting class began again, I decide to pull the painting out and re-do it using oils. I didn’t have Hanson’s painting to refer to as I had forgotten where I had found the image. So, I just painted over the acrylic paint with oils, using the acrylic painting to guide me into finishing it. This took me about a month of classes once a week, and only last Tuesday did I finally consider it finished and not needing anything else.

I finally found the image of “Coastal Light.” Comparing my version to hers, I found that what I really like with both are the way the tree trunks are delineated using light colors to show light without overdoing details. Foliage, too, was something which pleased me in both paintings, with Hanson’s being a bit more expressive than mine – I am a dabber, and my foliage is definitely dabbed! When it came to bigger areas of color, such as the distant mountain, foliage, and foreground, my dabs got all mushed together to create better color masses and shapes.

For me, a master copy is to learn whatever I learn. I have no goals specifically in mind. What I came away with was an awareness of my need to stop dabbing and become a bit more bold in applying areas of paint. My dabs work well when I mush them together as subtle color variations can show up. I really liked doing the tree trunks and the foliage, working to get a sense of the direction of light on the trunk and the movement of the fluttering leaves. Achieving a sense of depth using the contrast of shadows falling across the path – lighter in the distance – was a bit of a challenge but my lovely instructor, Barbara, really helped me see what I was not seeing.

An oil painting master copy is sort of a luxurious event because time is on my side. Watercolor master copies, such as with Seago, are very immediate as watercolor is simply watercolor! Doing this, my first master copy in oils, I have come away with a better sense of how to paint a mood and light. Even better, my level of frustration was very low once I began working in oils – acrylics really cause me to get agitated because I feel like I have to work so fast to do this or that before they dry. Altogether, I enjoyed this and learned more about how to use my paints. For me, the trees were the best part of this adventure.

Erin Hanson’s colors always appeal to me, and, of course, color is subjective. Her sense of composition is one of her strong points, and her brushwork is enjoyable because it creates an energy that works well with much of her subject matter. I may try another one, working a bit differently than I did here, because the entire process was both challenging and satisfying. On top of that, she loves landscapes and the great outdoors – much preferable to portraits I think!