It feels as if ages have passed since I picked up a watercolor brush to paint. Out of all the media, watercolor is by far the hardest and to do it well it needs to be done often. I tend to be a bit “precious” – and by this I mean it is far too easy to look at too many details and fail to simplify and pay attention. When I haven’t painted in a while – in watercolor – I tend to just dive in and see what sort of mess I can make, or not make. This first painting exemplifies this.
One good thing, I didn’t create mud, but my sense of depth and contrast was not well done. The sky was dramatic, but I made it too dramatic. The mountains and far edge of the water is poorly defined and overly defined at the same time. They all could be a bit more pale so that the trees on the left could look better. And then the leaves on the trees themselves are not well projected against the sky. But, as a bit of a save, the choppy water has a rather nice energy.
So, a bit too much altogether in the above painting. When I find myself doing too much (IMO), I always like to look to Edward Wesson or Edward Seago for simplicity. I found a painting by Wesson which is just simplicity itself, and did a bit of a quick study of it. Unfortunately, I cannot give the name or year he did this particular watercolor.
The first painting was done mostly with rounds and a small flat. For this one, I used a 1 inch wide flat brush with stiff bristles. I wet the paper a lot and then just painted. This how I try to get that gracefulness and simplicity so characteristic of so many of Wesson’s landscapes. I feel this is far more successful than the first one, and it makes me feel a bit happier with the painting process – like meeting up with a comfortable friend.
Watercolor, Arches Rough, 10×14 paper.
