Tag: landscape

Master Copy: Erin Hanson’s “Coastal Light”

Erin Hanson painted this painting in 2017 and it measures 24×30 inches. You can find it here on her website. It is called “Coastal Light” and it shows an evening (my opinion) in Southern California sometime in the spring when the rains have come and the hills are green.

I chose this to use as a master copy because the composition is simple, and I felt I could relate to it emotionally. For me, connecting with a painting or subject matter is very subjective – if I don’t like something I am not interested. I also felt I could handle the colors comfortably.

My own painting is in oils and as I worked on my copy, obviously things shifted. This master copy measures 16×20 inches, so of course my proportions are a bit different.

A number of things drew me to this painting. First, as I stated above, was the relative simplicity of the composition. The colors Hanson uses are vibrant and the air shimmers a bit. The leaves seem to flutter in a light breeze. I like the quiet energy of “Coastal Light”. The spring evening is very gentle. Additionally, what also attracted me was the way Hanson subtly outlines the shapes of the tree trunks, vegetation, clouds and terrain. Brush strokes give a sense of direction, especially in the foreground.

Initially, I tried to paint this using acrylic paint. I laid down the initial painting about 6 months ago, and really did not like it. Acrylic paints are not easy to use as they dry so quickly. I found the painting rather harsh and was thinking of painting over it with something else. Instead, it sat in the garage, ignored. And, I think, that was not a bad thing.

When my current painting class began again, I decide to pull the painting out and re-do it using oils. I didn’t have Hanson’s painting to refer to as I had forgotten where I had found the image. So, I just painted over the acrylic paint with oils, using the acrylic painting to guide me into finishing it. This took me about a month of classes once a week, and only last Tuesday did I finally consider it finished and not needing anything else.

I finally found the image of “Coastal Light.” Comparing my version to hers, I found that what I really like with both are the way the tree trunks are delineated using light colors to show light without overdoing details. Foliage, too, was something which pleased me in both paintings, with Hanson’s being a bit more expressive than mine – I am a dabber, and my foliage is definitely dabbed! When it came to bigger areas of color, such as the distant mountain, foliage, and foreground, my dabs got all mushed together to create better color masses and shapes.

For me, a master copy is to learn whatever I learn. I have no goals specifically in mind. What I came away with was an awareness of my need to stop dabbing and become a bit more bold in applying areas of paint. My dabs work well when I mush them together as subtle color variations can show up. I really liked doing the tree trunks and the foliage, working to get a sense of the direction of light on the trunk and the movement of the fluttering leaves. Achieving a sense of depth using the contrast of shadows falling across the path – lighter in the distance – was a bit of a challenge but my lovely instructor, Barbara, really helped me see what I was not seeing.

An oil painting master copy is sort of a luxurious event because time is on my side. Watercolor master copies, such as with Seago, are very immediate as watercolor is simply watercolor! Doing this, my first master copy in oils, I have come away with a better sense of how to paint a mood and light. Even better, my level of frustration was very low once I began working in oils – acrylics really cause me to get agitated because I feel like I have to work so fast to do this or that before they dry. Altogether, I enjoyed this and learned more about how to use my paints. For me, the trees were the best part of this adventure.

Erin Hanson’s colors always appeal to me, and, of course, color is subjective. Her sense of composition is one of her strong points, and her brushwork is enjoyable because it creates an energy that works well with much of her subject matter. I may try another one, working a bit differently than I did here, because the entire process was both challenging and satisfying. On top of that, she loves landscapes and the great outdoors – much preferable to portraits I think!

Edward Seago: The Hill Copse

As I mentioned the other day, I have been thinking about the bold washes as done by the British artist Edward Seago. He grew to adulthood in rather interesting historical times and while living contributed to society as well as the art world in many different capacities. As a watercolorist, he creates complex scenes with a broad swaths of paint. While not a great reproduction, at least in my opinion, here is Seago’s watercolor “The Hill Copse”.

You can read a bit about it at Bonham’s, which is where the above image is located.

This is a very monochromatic painting, but I expect the original was more rich in color than is shown. During Seago’s time, many colors used fugitive pigments, meaning they fade with time. Today’s watercolor manufacturers still produce colors which can fade, but many employ chemistry that is labeled as “permanent” and so do not use the original pigment formulae.

Two good examples of fugitive colors are rose madder genuine (made by Winsor Newton) and alizarin crimson. The rose madder genuine is still available, but it is important to know it can fade to a dullish brown. Many old colors are like this, and while lovely, makes one pause to consider when painting. I have this paint, and it is one of the prettiest pinks – and have dyed yarn and fabric with rose madder that I have grown – but fading is also part of its characteristics.

But I digress. I chose this painting because of the elegant simplicity of the washes to capture complex shapes. The sky is dramatic, the sandy track uphill to the copse, the sense of distance to the left – evident to the eye, and painted with amazing simplicity – suggestions of reality rather than a more complicated syntactically correct visual statement (hahahaha).

I interpreted the colors I thought would work here for my own “master copy” and chose ultramarine blue, cobalt blue, burnt sienna, burnt umber, yellow ochre, cadmium yellow, and Hooker’s green.

Obviously, there are differences in Seago’s painting and my own, but I do think I managed the overall simplicity of the washes and colors. As with all watercolors, white paper is left for brightness and interest, and wet-into-wet was done along with wet-onto-dry. To keep things simple and think about the shapes prior to plopping down color was foremost in my mind, but at the same time I considered the original painting an pondered the techniques used by Seago while painting.

This is quite the challenge for someone like me! But, fun was had, and I think I will continue to both reproduce some of Seago’s work as well as reconsider how I paint new subject matter.

Master copy, watercolor, Hahnemuhle 140# / 300 gsm CP paper, 9×12.

A Palm Tree, ii

After my satisfaction with yesterday’s watercolor and my ongoing interest in palm trees, I thought about a couple of things. First, I need to get over my fear of buildings. Second, I need to paint more palm trees! So, I decided to use a photo I took awhile ago and posted here to use as subject matter. Below is the original photo which was taken at the Santa Barbara Zoo, near the condors (I think). The zoo itself is a wonderful resource and is always undergoing change and development. I’ve been going there for decades and always like it as it is large enough for a good visit and small enough so you don’t have to move in for a few days!

A Palm Tree

The photo itself is nothing especially exciting but it does give a good display of palm fronds. I am not sure what species this palm is, but it so classical! As well, there are some dracena palms on the right by the lights, which are very different in growth pattern that the one front and center.

Part of me wanted to make the painting simpler, but I also wanted to suggest a bright, sparkly day. The photograph was of a rather hazy day so I had to use a bit of imagination to get the fronds to catch the glittery appearance such palm fronds can have, especially in intense light with a bit of a breeze.

Overall, I like the way this painting turned out. I had to do a bit of glazing to tone things down here and there. Splattering helped for texture. White gouache to do a bit of glare here and there. Yesterday’s painting of an adobe reminded me how easy buildings can be, and today, though simple areas exist in the form of walls, the roof was a bit mossy from the damp of being a few blocks from the Pacific Ocean.

As a quick after thought, I think that the palm tree – the dracena – emerging from the right side of the building is perhaps unnecessary. Into Photoshop and tree removal very poorly done with generative fill – just because I can and could.

Watercolor, Arches 140# CP paper, 9×12.

Too Dark

I just realized that if I want to do good – in my eyes, of course – or better ink and watercolor drawings, I need to work a bit more on my colors. For many years my colors were anemic and paintings ended up pale and wan. To compensate, I made my colors more intense – more pigment, less water. However, I think if I really want to do ink and wash, I need to learn to moderate the color intensity a lot. Next painting I do will have color swatches on another piece of paper before applying them to the paper.

This is a very contrasty painting – and it doesn’t really play well with the eye. The shadow along the dirt road, on the left, is too green. The darks between the trees, from shadow and overgrowth, are not well done. I liked the ink drawing but think I could have made better color choices. Unfortunately, when you use a limited palette of only 10 basic colors, color mixing becomes a bit of a challenge. That is not to say these were not good quality paints – they are Schminke pan paints which are very intense – but I need to work more with moderating the colors.

Well, I didn’t paint anything yesterday, but I am beginning to work on cleaning up and getting rid of stuff. Yesterday I worked in the garden, straightening things up, getting rid of debris, and taking apart the drip system. With fewer plants it is unnecessary. This morning, sorting through clothes and mish mash in the in the garage.

However, painting continues!

Sketchbook across 2 pages, about 6×16 inches; ink and watercolor.

Under the Cottonwoods

Cottonwood trees make bright yellow splashes of color in autumn. The dark trunks and limbs curve in between and the drama of these trees cannot be underestimated in the muted colors of the desert. For me, they epitomize the southwest in fall, and to see them in full color is really wonderful.

Here, another painting in gouache, and this time one that was difficult to do. Somehow I don’t think it has the crispness of the day I was trying to express. The drama of the light – dark contrast is there, but perhaps because the leaves of the cottonwoods are always more detailed in my eye than is shown here. At first I thought my scanner was a bit soft, but I really don’t know. Oh, well!

I did this painting on tan toned paper. Perhaps that adds to my sense of it not being quite what I wanted. Below is the original painting in my sketchbook.

Whatever – it is certainly something for me to think about. Gouache is opaque unless really diluted, so I am not too sure how much the toned paper is affecting my color perception.

Gouache, 9×12 toned paper, painting about 7×10.