
With film disappearing – and reappearing – it seems the only new cameras for film are made of plastic and don’t cost too much or else are quite expensive. Â There is something to be said for both approaches, but the quality of pictures taken with a plastic camera are not as “good” to my eye as are ones made from better quality film cameras, whether old or new.

Of late, I have been enjoying the usage of old folding cameras, made from the 1930s and into the 1950s, which use both 35mm and 120mm film. Â Besides the folders, I do have some SLRs, but, those are for discussing another time. Â The folders are weird (compared to today’s digital) and definitely slower. Â I mean, you have to get the film developed, or do it yourself! Â The majority of folding cameras use 120mm film, but 35mm did make its debut in the 1930s, popularized by Leica.

When I become interested in something, I tend to end up with a small collection. Â That is what has happened with folding cameras. Â I have ones which range from 6×4.5 to 6×6 to 6×9, all in cm, not inches. Â They use 120 film, and the results can be great to deplorable, but always interesting. Â The 6×6 square format is perhaps the most challenging because the viewfinders are offset and the image – as is for all of these kinds of cameras (non-SLR) – but with a square format, the eye wants to move into the center.


So, here are some images. Â I plan on taking some of these cameras up to the Sierra Nevadas next week, along with a digital or two . . .

Meanwhile, I hope you enjoy all these square images, taken with an early 1950s Perkeo II by Voigtlander, sporting a 75mm Color Skopar f3.5 lens, and Portra 400 film by Kodak. Â Post in LR and other critters.