
I think we may have had 2 inches / 5 cm. of rain this spring. That’s it. The hills are now an August-brown, and the lush growth of a month ago is turning the colors of autumn. Drought.

I think we may have had 2 inches / 5 cm. of rain this spring. That’s it. The hills are now an August-brown, and the lush growth of a month ago is turning the colors of autumn. Drought.


Last year I was hiking in a favorite area, and came across a movie set. This was what was there, along with spooky gates and other such things. It was situated in a public place. It was Easter Sunday.
There was a security guard there. He yelled and wave his arms at us – like a ghost? – telling us we couldn’t even look at the set, much less photograph it. Well, my taxes pay for the park, it is public property, and I wasn’t hurting anything. I got this picture, but wish I had gotten more.
Later, I called the city, and complained, and they assured me I was within my rights, and they were also annoyed with the movie company as they had emphasized the fact it is on public property.
Unknown film; with a Canonet GIII QL rangefinder ca. 1970.

This next year I want to explore film photography more. This picture is not really exciting, but it is a jpg produced on a professional scanner by a professional film developing company. I haven’t gotten the negatives back yet, but I suspect it is a 400 iso film; I hope the negs will tell me which film is what!
I like the grain, and I like the colors – not what I would normally get in a SOOC image on any of my digital cameras. In LR, I can really manipulate the noise / grain to make it nearly disappear – but is that what I really want to do?
Looking at the scans, I see there is a lot to consider in film photography, especially since it really does look different than digital, even in a jpg!

No, it’s not me.