![]()
What do these have in common? Â Both are useful, both are usually ugly.
Given this, these past few days I have been on the quest for a good buttonhole. Â I’ve found that the classic eyelet buttonhole is by far the easiest, and attractive. Â Unfortunately it is not going to gracefully accommodate a large button if you are using fine yarn.
I have tried a number of them, and none have pleased me, though some have intrigued me. Â The best one, beyond the eyelet, is the “Two Lip” or “Tulip” buttonhole by TechKnitter, a genius in the ranks of the knitting world. Â It is a bit of work, but I think I can get it. Â It was featured in the Summer 2010 issue of Interweave Knits, and it is presented here by Eunny Jang.
In trying out a number of buttonholes, it becomes pretty obvious what their major failing is: Â to complete the buttonhole, you turn your work, creating one extra row of new stitches, over which you then work another row. Â The result is lumps and holes, and uneven stitches. Â Very, very ugly.
This does not occur with the eyelet, nor the Tulips buttonhole. Â The eyelet is straightforward – k2tog, yo – and continue on your merry way. Â The Tulips buttonhole requires some wraps, unwraps, fiddling with a crochet hook and a double-pointed needle, but it works. Â The upper part of the buttonhole is continued in the same direction as you are originally knitting, adding the stitches by doing a yarn over and making a loop with the crochet hook. Â Kind of messy to do initially, but it will get graceful later on.
In sewing, I hated buttonholes so much I would make loops for everything. Â I have only made eyelets for sweaters because everything else was so dreadful. Â As I am designing a sweater for Josh, an eyelet buttonhole will not accommodate a button an inch in diameter. Â Necessity forced me into the search – I’ve ripped the sweater out twice now! – and I hope that I will get it down. Â Meanwhile, I plan to practice, practice, practice!


















